量: £
リンクウェブサイト(任意):

翻訳しなさい

Translate to Englishترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese SimplifiedПереведите к русскому/RussianTraduza ao Português/PortugueseOversetter til Norsk/NorwegianVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutch
한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/SpanishΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/German中文翻译/Chinese Traditional
Plugin by Taragana

あなたの帖当の状態

帖当を作ることができるように登録しなさい。

ポストのアーカイブ

最近のコメント

国連、私達の意見

花は次私達が国際連合システムをいかに見るかである。 国連は多くの異なった部品から言葉の`国際連合が」代理店、施設および加盟州の全範囲を含んでいるように、成っている。 流入のプロジェクトはまた国連システムのより評価された部分べきである世界の人々を表すことを望む。





流入のプロジェクトは国連の構造のいくつかの問題を認識する:

審判員
国連は特に平和、保証、国際法および人権の問題が濫用されているとき国際的な開発のコースに沿う独立した審判員として機能するために基本的にある。

共同損失
The UN is often criticised by people, mostly by people who do not actually contribute anything to it themselves and mistakenly expect it to work without them. Equally, the UN fails to provide satisfying opportunities to engage the public and rally their willingness for the UN to succeed.

Inherited Structure
Just as if the clock stopped when the UN was formed, the legal structure of the UN reflects the world as it stood over 60 years ago. Without any means to change this structure itself we are stuck with a frankly divisive structure that increasingly become more and more inappropriate for achieving its aims.

Lost Intention
The UN charter clearly opens with the words ???We the peoples?????? However the UN has become something more accurately described as ???We, the dominant governments of yesteryear??????. It would be hard to argue reasonably that the UN reaches or represents its intended actors and beneficiaries, the peoples.

Inconsistency
When you have a program for spreading democracy but don???t adhere to these principles yourself???when the five permanent members of the Security Council are also the world???s 5 biggest arms dealers???essential trust is lost.

External Help Required
We feel that the current UN structure leaves the UN itself incapable of any reform worth doing. While it is certainly a considerable challenge we feel that the situation to be remedied best by an external, independent body such as we seek to provide by engaging you with the work of the Influx Project.

Below is a chart to demonstrate the unbalanced financial input to the UN that currently exsists.




In Progress

Rather than judging the UN to be either good or bad we simply see it to be at an awkward, teenage stage of its development, a stage at which it needs good friends and support more than ever if it is to become all it can be.


For the Influx Project’s solutions to these problem see: Problems and Solutions
We hope you can identify with our view of the UN. If you remember just one thing it???s that we can???t expect to benefit from a better UN without you.





__